The New British High Commissioner & Mistimed Perception of Hiranmay Karlekar
Posted by xanthis on April 1, 2008
Being an expert on a country, where there is no sort of relation for more than 22 years, the career is too drowsy. Now, the 9/11 attack and Twin Towers’ getting collapsed couldn’t promulgate him a lot though, the declaration of George W. Bush that the architect of 9/11 is Osama Bin Laden & Osama is in Afghanistan, this finally worked. Now that drowsy career shook itself up & showed up with demand. We are talking about the person who first thought of reopening the British Embassy at Kabul in 2001 which was shut off in 1979 and later shattered by a mob in 1995.
Afghanistan expert and head of the South East Asia Department of United Kingdom’s Foreign & Commonwealth Office, Mr. Stephen Evans has been chosen as the next British High Commissioner to Bangladesh. Replacing Anwar Chowdhury, Evans will be in the office in this June. Hiranmay Karlekar, the guy who lives on bashing Bangladesh abusively, once wrote a book called “Bangladesh – The Next Afghanistan?”. I don’t know, may be there has been a mistimed perception from Karlekar’s side, or may be there has been United Kingdom’s late realization of the greatness of the author Hiranmay Karlekar. Ultimately they have decided to send somebody who however has been one of the roles of the drama that Karlekar once talked of and agonizingly is being played in Bangladesh in present.
Let’s take a short look at Stephen Evans.
Stephen Evans, a 58 years old diplomat has formerly served in the Tank Regiment of British Army from 1971 to 1974 as an officer. Mr. Evans is the Foreign Office specialist on Afghanistan, normally a diplomatic backwater ignored by the high flyers. The September 11 attacks changed that and Mr Evans has been much in demand. It was from him that ministers, diplomatic colleagues and journalists heard for the first time about the Loya Jirga, the historic Afghan decision-making forum, and the other complexities of Afghan politics. His briefings were delivered in the manner of an academic in love with his subject, desperate to inform, rather than a diplomat cautiously calculating the impact of each word, desperate to avoid controversy. A Foreign Office colleague spoke yesterday about Mr Evans’s enthusiasm for the region: “He has taken on the job with relish.” The colleague added that part of the attraction for Mr Evans was the challenge that a post-Taliban Afghanistan presented: “He knows how many different ways it could go.” He is married with three children.
Now, a third-world country expert and an expert of a country like Afghanistan, have some characteristic differences between them. The properness of power in a country can strictly regulate behaviors of diplomats. Political anarchies are not really the main issue in this particular case. Many developed and well democratized states see political instabilities. After the Iraq war got started, all of the nations who took part have experienced large scale demonstrations against the government. They often have been organized by particular political oppositions of the party in power. Political unrests may come to the streets but not in every case key diplomats lose their passion & the sense of official rights. In those countries, diplomats need to remember the Vienna Convention. Now, Afghanistan is one of the nations of the world, where diplomats enjoy the full freedom to say anything they want about anything. The situation was different from late 70’s to the 2001 US Invasion, but the situation after the US Invasion, diplomats never need to practice what bull shit (in their sense) is written in Vienna Convention or whatever.
Our new (to be) High Commissioner from United Kingdom, Mr. Stephen Evans have been through an atmosphere of complete freedom of speeches that means a compulsive meddling tendency due to the improperness of power in Afghanistan. Rather, he is an expert of that country who was sent their before a week passed after the fall of Kabul from Taleban; an expert of providing unlawful instructions on how inner matters of the host nation should go. Anwar Chowdhury who got the recognition of ‘Lord Clive’ due to his uncontrolled & unauthorized interferences to extreme internal matters of Bangladesh, has been decided to be replaced by such a person, who is by name some sort of ‘meddler’. Anwar Chowdhury at least had no such career backgrounds though he has been one, but this time the British government has decided to get in to the matter quite well exposed by sending somebody officially heeded as not been through the proper practices of a diplomat. He has been an expert of a genre of an nation, which is not used to have elections or any sort of practices of democracy. So I don’t think the appointment of Stephen Evans will be able to add up some optimization for us to get out of the present instable state of Bangladesh.
Hiranmay Karlekar’s “Bangladesh – The Next Afghanistan?” was published in January 2006 from Delhi. But, it was 2 years later, United Kingdom came to think Karlekar is correct or they themselves have realized Bangladesh is now at an optimistic stage to way being Afghanistan. They have sent an Afghanistan Expert to deal with foreign relations between Bangladesh & them. Now we should hail, “Ekhoni Shomoy!” (This is The Time!), eh?
(I am expecting some report to come published in Prothom Alo or Daily Star recognizing Stephen Evans as one of greatest diplomats Bangladesh could ever have.)





Blazin said
Politicians are sounding rough these days. May be Brown doesn’t think Anwar fit to handle this, he sent a guy who is used to deal with Afghan type politics. I never guessed things gone that messed up in here man! We & Afghans, all of us are now in the same boat?
Yeah baby! EKHONI SHOMOY…
glaucoma said
I don’t know why, but I guess that this kind of an appointment was expected by this government, but has been absolutely surprise to our politicians.
Blazin said
I don’t think this regime asked for somebody like him. But the reason behind sending an Afghanistan expert matches the reason of this regime’s anxiety.
xanthis said
#1 & #3
Yes, these are one of the reasons I guess.
#2
Need more time to be served with an answer of it.
Blazin said
Type of comments those politicians are putting over the present situation, their stubborn voices, were however unthinkable six months back. But now they have been quite usual. BNP says new declarations to come after KDH returns, AL says they’re gonna hit the streets soon. Chhatrodol meeting is closed and at the demonstration after that, leaders talked of a ‘gono obbhutthan’.
Not very good signs for the doctorate cabinet.
xanthis said
I guess the failure of COS’s India tour has changed a lot of things.
Abias said
May be Lord “Evans” Clive doesn’t feel good about beggars. His welcome now is gonna be with a outrageous removal of beggars from Dhaka’s streets. Ekhoni Shomoy…
Abias said
Click here
fugstar said
Xanthis bhai,
I think you migt be over analysing this, and over estimating the importance of banglaesh from the brit side. For your information nobody has really been jumping up and down for the BD post.
i think we should focus attention on Evans’s moustache. its badass.
xanthis said
As a wartime Ambassador in Afghanistan, Evans has a special sort of recognition that will be never going to help Bangladesh in anyways. And his mustache is good. Patricia was named “Beauty Apa”, Anwar was called “Banglaa Mat-te pari”. I am waiting for the name of this Evans.
GF said
i vote for vangari
fug said
Tank mama?
Do you think theres any chance that a BD govt would expell ambassadors/high commissioners for meddling? i mean all we need is a strong leader and to own our problems. at least then theres some more self respect.
i can just picture him swooping to save random londoni men from the clutches of bizzare marriages. i think the tache gives him a unique kudos.
heres a serious thought though. foreigners sent us ladies when the two netris were running things. To send a military man (only 3 years though?!?) might indicate preparation for several more years of military punctuation. I feel that the foreign leaning towards indulging bangladeshi democrats is at an all time low. The two parties have no standing any longer outside the country. I dont know how they can stand up without shame…. but then again i dont think i ever did.
The world has seen imposed democracy and moronarchy cause dramatic harm and BD has the worlds PITY. im not happy to say this, but thats how they see us.
xanthis said
Where India has to face difficulties about the ambassadors to them, we don’t expect enough from Bangladesh. I remember an American Ambassador to India (I forgot his name, probably Robert Blackwill or William Clarke), who was fallen into the controversy of visiting defense related reserved areas of India by Indian military helicopter and later pass those information to CIA or something like that.
So, whats happening in Bangladesh is more serious than that of India. I don’t think that the “Amra Shobai Raja” attitude of Ambassadors (from all parts of the world) in Bangladesh, the scene is not like this in our neighboring countries. May be a diplomats from a certain nation get priority but not all of them are able to give lectures after lectures to administrators there like they are able to do here in Bangladesh.
Blazin said
So finally he reached….
Ike Karpinen said
My personal generally do not leave feedback yet the idea should be this time! My personal added the on reddit!